Fix failing command tests
- Detailed description missing period - Fix twice defined /authme delete - Add executable command to HelpSyntaxHelperTest initializations - Remove unneeded constructors in CommandDescription
This commit is contained in:
parent
6a94135f64
commit
7c652feac2
@ -59,19 +59,6 @@ public class CommandDescription {
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private CommandPermissions permissions;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Constructor.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @param executableCommand The executable command, or null.
|
||||
* @param label Command label.
|
||||
* @param description Command description.
|
||||
* @param detailedDescription Detailed comment description.
|
||||
* @param parent Parent command.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public CommandDescription(ExecutableCommand executableCommand, String label, String description, String detailedDescription, CommandDescription parent) {
|
||||
this(executableCommand, label, description, parent, detailedDescription, null);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Constructor.
|
||||
*
|
||||
@ -85,25 +72,6 @@ public class CommandDescription {
|
||||
this(executableCommand, labels, description, detailedDescription, parent, null);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Constructor.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @param executableCommand The executable command, or null.
|
||||
* @param label Command label.
|
||||
* @param description Command description.
|
||||
* @param parent Parent command.
|
||||
* @param detailedDescription Detailed comment description.
|
||||
* @param arguments Command arguments.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public CommandDescription(ExecutableCommand executableCommand, String label, String description, CommandDescription parent, String detailedDescription, List<CommandArgumentDescription> arguments) {
|
||||
setExecutableCommand(executableCommand);
|
||||
this.labels = Collections.singletonList(label);
|
||||
this.description = description;
|
||||
this.detailedDescription = detailedDescription;
|
||||
setParent(parent);
|
||||
setArguments(arguments);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Constructor.
|
||||
*
|
||||
|
||||
@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ public class CommandManager {
|
||||
// Register the unregister command
|
||||
CommandDescription unregisterCommand = CommandDescription.builder()
|
||||
.executableCommand(new UnregisterCommand())
|
||||
.labels("unregister", "unreg", "unr", "delete", "del")
|
||||
.labels("unregister", "unreg", "unr")
|
||||
.description("Unregister a player")
|
||||
.detailedDescription("Unregister the specified player.")
|
||||
.parent(authMeBaseCommand)
|
||||
@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ public class CommandManager {
|
||||
.executableCommand(new LastLoginCommand())
|
||||
.labels("lastlogin", "ll")
|
||||
.description("Player's last login")
|
||||
.detailedDescription("View the date of the specified players last login")
|
||||
.detailedDescription("View the date of the specified players last login.")
|
||||
.parent(authMeBaseCommand)
|
||||
.permissions(OP_ONLY, AdminPermission.LAST_LOGIN)
|
||||
.withArgument("player", "Player name", true)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ package fr.xephi.authme.command;
|
||||
|
||||
import fr.xephi.authme.util.StringUtils;
|
||||
import org.junit.BeforeClass;
|
||||
import org.junit.Ignore;
|
||||
import org.junit.Test;
|
||||
|
||||
import java.util.ArrayList;
|
||||
@ -16,9 +15,10 @@ import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.equalTo;
|
||||
import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.not;
|
||||
import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.nullValue;
|
||||
import static org.junit.Assert.assertThat;
|
||||
import static org.junit.Assert.fail;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Test for {@link CommandManager}.
|
||||
* Test for {@link CommandManager}, especially to guarantee the integrity of the defined commands.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public class CommandManagerTest {
|
||||
|
||||
@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ public class CommandManagerTest {
|
||||
commandMappings.addAll(newMappings);
|
||||
// Set only contains unique entries, so we just check after adding all new mappings that the size
|
||||
// of the Set corresponds to our expectation
|
||||
assertThat("All bindings are unique for command with bindings '" + command.getLabels() + "'",
|
||||
assertThat("All bindings are unique for command with bindings '" + newMappings + "'",
|
||||
commandMappings.size() == initialSize + newMappings.size(), equalTo(true));
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
@ -91,18 +91,21 @@ public class CommandManagerTest {
|
||||
* detailed description should be longer and end with a period.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void shouldHaveDescription() {
|
||||
public void shouldHaveProperDescription() {
|
||||
// given
|
||||
BiConsumer descriptionTester = new BiConsumer() {
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public void accept(CommandDescription command, int depth) {
|
||||
assertThat("has description", StringUtils.isEmpty(command.getDescription()), equalTo(false));
|
||||
assertThat("short description doesn't end in '.'", command.getDescription().endsWith("."),
|
||||
equalTo(false));
|
||||
assertThat("has detailed description", StringUtils.isEmpty(command.getDetailedDescription()),
|
||||
equalTo(false));
|
||||
assertThat("detailed description ends in '.'", command.getDetailedDescription().endsWith("."),
|
||||
equalTo(true));
|
||||
String forCommandText = " for command with labels '" + command.getLabels() + "'";
|
||||
|
||||
assertThat("has description" + forCommandText,
|
||||
StringUtils.isEmpty(command.getDescription()), equalTo(false));
|
||||
assertThat("short description doesn't end in '.'" + forCommandText,
|
||||
command.getDescription().endsWith("."), equalTo(false));
|
||||
assertThat("has detailed description" + forCommandText,
|
||||
StringUtils.isEmpty(command.getDetailedDescription()), equalTo(false));
|
||||
assertThat("detailed description ends in '.'" + forCommandText,
|
||||
command.getDetailedDescription().endsWith("."), equalTo(true));
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
@ -142,6 +145,51 @@ public class CommandManagerTest {
|
||||
walkThroughCommands(commands, descriptionTester);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void shouldHaveOptionalArgumentsAfterMandatoryOnes() {
|
||||
// given
|
||||
BiConsumer argumentOrderTester = new BiConsumer() {
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public void accept(CommandDescription command, int depth) {
|
||||
boolean encounteredOptionalArg = false;
|
||||
for (CommandArgumentDescription argument : command.getArguments()) {
|
||||
if (argument.isOptional()) {
|
||||
encounteredOptionalArg = true;
|
||||
} else if (!argument.isOptional() && encounteredOptionalArg) {
|
||||
fail("Mandatory arguments should come before optional ones for command with labels '"
|
||||
+ command.getLabels() + "'");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// when/then
|
||||
walkThroughCommands(manager.getCommandDescriptions(), argumentOrderTester);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Ensure that a command with children (i.e. a base command) doesn't define any arguments. This might otherwise
|
||||
* clash with the label of the child.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void shouldNotHaveArgumentsIfCommandHasChildren() {
|
||||
// given
|
||||
BiConsumer noArgumentForParentChecker = new BiConsumer() {
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public void accept(CommandDescription command, int depth) {
|
||||
// Fail if the command has children and has arguments at the same time
|
||||
// Exception: If the parent only has one child defining the help label, it is acceptable
|
||||
if (command.hasChildren() && command.hasArguments()
|
||||
&& (command.getChildren().size() != 1 || !command.getChildren().get(0).hasLabel("help"))) {
|
||||
fail("Parent command (labels='" + command.getLabels() + "') should not have any arguments");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// when/then
|
||||
walkThroughCommands(manager.getCommandDescriptions(), noArgumentForParentChecker);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// ------------
|
||||
// Helper methods
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1,17 +1,12 @@
|
||||
package fr.xephi.authme.command.help;
|
||||
|
||||
import fr.xephi.authme.command.CommandArgumentDescription;
|
||||
import fr.xephi.authme.command.CommandDescription;
|
||||
import fr.xephi.authme.command.CommandParts;
|
||||
import fr.xephi.authme.command.executable.authme.AuthMeCommand;
|
||||
import fr.xephi.authme.command.ExecutableCommand;
|
||||
import fr.xephi.authme.command.executable.authme.RegisterCommand;
|
||||
import org.junit.Test;
|
||||
import org.mockito.Mockito;
|
||||
|
||||
import java.util.ArrayList;
|
||||
import java.util.Arrays;
|
||||
|
||||
import static java.util.Collections.singletonList;
|
||||
import static org.bukkit.ChatColor.BOLD;
|
||||
import static org.bukkit.ChatColor.ITALIC;
|
||||
import static org.bukkit.ChatColor.WHITE;
|
||||
@ -142,6 +137,7 @@ public class HelpSyntaxHelperTest {
|
||||
.description("Base command")
|
||||
.detailedDescription("AuthMe base command")
|
||||
.parent(null)
|
||||
.executableCommand(Mockito.mock(ExecutableCommand.class))
|
||||
.build();
|
||||
|
||||
return CommandDescription.builder()
|
||||
@ -149,6 +145,7 @@ public class HelpSyntaxHelperTest {
|
||||
.labels("register", "r")
|
||||
.description("Register a player")
|
||||
.detailedDescription("Register the specified player with the specified password.")
|
||||
.parent(base);
|
||||
.parent(base)
|
||||
.executableCommand(Mockito.mock(ExecutableCommand.class));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user